|
Research in the
Social Marketing Process
continued from
Overview
Planning
An effective social marketing strategy
must be built on the foundation of solid research. Without this,
creative ideas may emerge, but like the lost pilot breaking the
speed record described by Bill Bernbach, the wrong destination
will be reached even more quickly. The purpose of research in
this stage is to learn as much about the target audience and
market as possible, in order to steer the program in the right
direction. This may include both reviewing secondary research
sources and conducting primary research, such as surveys, focus
groups or in-depth interviews.
Secondary Research Review
When beginning a program, the crucial
first step is to find any available information that is applicable
to the marketing effort. Secondary data is information that has
already been collected for another purpose--in journals, popular
media, computer databases or other sources. A secondary research
review can help to provide preliminary answers to questions about
the scope of the public health or social problem, previous attempts
to address the problem, who the probable target audience is,
who the "competition" is (non-adoption of the "product"
may be the main competitor) and information about potential media
vehicles.
In social marketing, key sources
of information include technical and professional journals; national
public opinion polls, health and consumer surveys; past coverage
of the issue in newspapers, trade journals and consumer magazines;
census statistics and other demographic surveys; government health
departments; radio and television stations and local advertising
agencies and market research firms. Each can provide different
types of information, so it is desirable to be as thorough as
possible in the research review.
This method of information-gathering
can be a relatively quick and inexpensive way to become familiar
with the market and identify areas requiring further primary
research. However, data from these sources may not always be
current or accurate. In addition, the questions investigated
in someone else's study may not be relevant to the program.
Focus Groups
Focus groups are an excellent method
for obtaining information about the target audience's perceptions,
beliefs and language regarding a particular topic. It is a qualitative
method, which probes into the reasons that people feel and act
the way they do. Focus groups give more depth of information
than do surveys or other quantitative methods. By bringing together
a group of similar people, a forum is provided for them to discuss
a particular issue and react to each other's comments in a directed
way that is not possible through individual interviews or participant
observation.
Focus groups are used often throughout
the social marketing process, from the planning stages to development
and refinement of the message and materials. In situations where
time and cost are important considerations, focus groups may
be the most efficient method of data collection. Among their
many uses are: generating ideas about services or products, and
pretesting product positioning, message concepts or pre finished
communication materials.
A focus group generally consists
of eight to ten unacquainted participants, who are fairly similar
to each other in terms of sex, age, ethnic background, risk factors
and other relevant characteristics related to the target audience.
The group is led by a trained moderator, who poses open-ended
questions from a discussion outline and tries to involve everyone
in the discussion. This occurs in a comfortable, non-threatening
environment where participants are encouraged to speak what's
on their minds, especially if it is different than what other
people are saying. The discussion is usually recorded on audio
or video tape, and lasts one to two hours.
Although focus groups are an excellent
technique for obtaining qualitative information from several
respondents at once, there are some disadvantages to the method.
First, people may be reticent to discuss sensitive subjects,
such as sexual behavior, in front of a group. For certain topics,
it may be more appropriate to conduct individual in-depth interviews,
which use the qualitative probing questions of focus groups,
but afford more privacy to the respondent. Another disadvantage
is that focus group results are not directly projectable back
to the target population (i.e., one can't report that "2
out of 5 gay men don't want to practice safer sex...").
However, after hearing the same thing from a number of participants,
it is likely that their views are common to many in the target
audience. The qualitative nature of the research and small sample
sizes preclude the use of focus group results as baseline data
for program evaluation.
Baseline KAP Study
Based upon the information unearthed
by the secondary research review and/or focus groups, it should
be possible to narrow down the scope of the problem. Prior to
the implementation of a program, data are needed regarding audience
awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to the
program issue. In order to guide the development of the marketing
strategy and to provide a baseline from which to determine whether
the program accomplishes its goals, a KAP (knowledge, attitudes
and practices) study should be conducted. Using the preliminary
research, the survey is drafted and pre-tested in order to evaluate
its validity, reliability and to identify any other problems
with its design. As with any survey, the interviewers must be
trained, interviews must be conducted and data must be entered
and analyzed. This can be an expensive and time-consuming undertaking.
However, this type of survey can be very useful for identifying
and understanding the audience better in terms of their demographics,
psychographics and behaviors. Depending upon the validity of
the technique used, the survey can help estimate how many in
the population are "users" of the product (e.g., how
many practice safer sex), identify their attitudes toward the
product and learn other quantitative information on the attributes
of users and non-users.
Many other important facts can be
determined from the results of the KAP study. A crucial issue
is the consumer's readiness to adopt the product. Within the
population, there are many segments of people who have different
levels of awareness, knowledge or adoption of the behavior. In
Prochaska's "Stages of Change" model, consumers are
thought to move along a "readiness continuum," consisting
of different stages--from being unaware to aware, to knowledgeable,
interested, motivated, ready-to-try, users, and then possibly
non-users. The strategy that will be used for the program depends
upon the point on the continuum at which the majority of the
target audience is located. For example, gay males in San Francisco
who may need help in maintaining their safer sex behavior would
merit a much different approach than that used to create awareness
among heterosexual females in the midwest. Depending upon the
extensiveness of the study, other factors which can be identified
may include the level of consumer demand for the social marketing
product, insight into how to position the product, benefits and
barriers to use of the product and the media habits of the target
audience.
A thorough qualitative analysis
of the potential target audience should be conducted either as
part of the development of the KAP survey or to further explore
issues that arose from the survey. Once the target audience has
been identified, the next step is to learn as much about them
as possible. If this is done before the KAP questionnaire is
developed, the information can be used to make the survey even
more useful by giving insight into the consumers' lives, determining
the language used by the target audience about the topic and
identifying key issues which the researchers might not have recognized
themselves. The most common methods used to gather this qualitative
information are focus groups and marketing databases.
Marketing Databases
In addition to information about
attitudes and behaviors related to a particular topic, social
marketers need to know about their target audience's other habits
in order to reach them most effectively and efficiently. Major
marketing surveys, such as the DDB Needham Lifestyle Study, MRI
(Mediamark Research, Inc.), Simmons Market Research Bureau's
Study of Media and Markets (SMRB) and the Mendelsohn Research
Survey of Adults and Markets of Affluence, provide a more in-depth
understanding of target markets than standard demographic or
consumer surveys. They provide extensive information on demographics,
consumer buying habits and use of media. Another database, PRIZM,
clusters similar types of consumers demographically, based upon
their zip codes. Once the target audience has been identified,
the database can be used to provide additional information about
those people.
In some cases, social marketers
may want to better understand other groups who may influence
those in the target audience. These may include spouses, parents,
in-laws, doctors, policymakers or other influentials in their
lives. For example, the parents of asthmatic children or husbands
of women with breast cancer may be just as important to understand
and target. This can be done through any of the methodologies
described above.
Media Analysis
If the social marketing campaign
will be using mass media to promote the message (as most will),
it is crucial to identify the optimal media channels for placement
efforts. Media planning and analysis are an important investment,
even if relying upon stations to run public service announcements.
If messages miss the target audience, the effort is wasted and
will not be successful. Two ways to increase the chances of reaching
the target audience are: first, identifying the appropriate media
vehicles and second, understanding the media "gatekeepers"
who control the content and flow of information that reaches
the target audience.
In order to plan a successful media
campaign, social marketers must know how best to reach the target
audience. There are many sources of information on consumer media
habits. Among these are the aforementioned marketing databases,
along with the Scarborough Ratings Study and Arbitron/Nielsen
Ratings. These databases provide information on demographics
and media habits: television viewing (types of shows, dayparts,
networks), radio listening (networks, formats and dayparts),
magazines and newspapers read. These services can help to compare
which types of media, and specifically which vehicles, are used
most by the target audience. Based upon the cost of each, and
the estimated gross impressions for the target audience (how
many people it will reach), the most effective and efficient
vehicles for the campaign can be determined.
All of these databases vary, however,
in terms of geographic breakdown, income levels sampled and information
beyond bare demographics. For example, the Mendelsohn Research
Survey of Adults and Markets of Influence samples only people
with household incomes above $60,000. These databases may not
be a very good source of information on lower-SES audiences,
for they are difficult to reach through phone surveys, and are
not of much interest to marketers because of their low amount
of expendable income. There are a couple of sources that focus
on minority media habits, such as the US Hispanic Market, from
Strategy Research Corporation.
After identifying the key media
vehicles for the campaign, social marketers must research and
understand the media gatekeepers at these vehicles who are most
important to their program. These people include editors, producers,
writers, talk show hosts, public service directors and other
influentials in associations and organizations. Ideally, a survey
should be conducted to determine their awareness, knowledge and
attitudes on the issue, their interest in the topic and their
perceptions of how their audience views the topic. A gatekeeper
audit aids in predicting how these influential people will react
to the social marketing program, allowing proactive strategizing.
Combining the information gleaned from all of the sources in
the planning stages will produce a strong foundation for building
an effective program.
Previous | Next
Copyright ©1996-2003
Weinreich Communications / webmaster@social-marketing.com
|