NYC's Trans Fat Ban - Cheating or Fair Game?
- Nedra Weinreich
- Dec 6, 2006
- 1 min read

Well, they did it. The New York City Board of Health this afternoon voted to ban trans fats from all foods in restaurants throughout the city. Is this a good thing, or is it a case where coercion through policy is inappropriate? As a social marketer who wants people to become healthier, this would seem to be a no-brainer, yet I have mixed feelings about this development. This reminds me of Stephen Dann's comment on the Social Marketing listserv a while back, which Craig recounted on his blog:
This would not have been possible without the efforts of the anti-smoking forces that paved the way for policy change back in the 90s. I do see a difference, though, between restricting secondhand smoke -- which can affect the health of other people -- and restricting the use of trans fats -- which only affects the eater.That's not to say that getting restaurants to reduce or eliminate trans fats is not an important and worthy goal. But perhaps a social marketing campaign to restauranteurs, along with various incentives (e.g., tax breaks from the city for trans fat-free establishments) would have been a step to try before treating chefs like criminals.